<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Technology Adoption &#8211; An Expert’s View: Puridiom	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://cporising.com/2011/09/12/technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cporising.com/2011/09/12/technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom</link>
	<description>Analyst-led research and intelligence for the procurement community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 01:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jesus Ramos		</title>
		<link>https://cporising.com/2011/09/12/technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Ramos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cporising.com/?p=5568#comment-263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As luck might have it, we are sponsoring a webinar that talks about the relationship between the CPO and CFO and what kind of metrics to use to convey the value of the relationship. See the main cporising page or register at: http://tinyurl.com/PuridiomCFOCPO 
Also, without giving much away from a future article, most common collaborative metrics have to do with measuring activity lag time (time to approve, issue order, negotiate contract, etc.) Essentially is Procurement adding value to the operation?
No matter what you decide to measure, the key is to scale-down. Start with a company-wide measurement and as value becomes apparent, scale the measurement to the next level: division, then department, then user,  and so on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As luck might have it, we are sponsoring a webinar that talks about the relationship between the CPO and CFO and what kind of metrics to use to convey the value of the relationship. See the main cporising page or register at: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/PuridiomCFOCPO" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tinyurl.com/PuridiomCFOCPO</a><br />
Also, without giving much away from a future article, most common collaborative metrics have to do with measuring activity lag time (time to approve, issue order, negotiate contract, etc.) Essentially is Procurement adding value to the operation?<br />
No matter what you decide to measure, the key is to scale-down. Start with a company-wide measurement and as value becomes apparent, scale the measurement to the next level: division, then department, then user,  and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Shaw		</title>
		<link>https://cporising.com/2011/09/12/technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Shaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cporising.com/?p=5568#comment-261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Jesus,

Thanks for the article.   You mentioned &quot;Develop Callborative Metrics to Measure Performance&quot;.   Can you share some of the metrics you recommend tracking and the level of detail (company,department, user) that you track them to?

Thank you!

John]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jesus,</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.   You mentioned &#8220;Develop Callborative Metrics to Measure Performance&#8221;.   Can you share some of the metrics you recommend tracking and the level of detail (company,department, user) that you track them to?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arun Srinivasan		</title>
		<link>https://cporising.com/2011/09/12/technology-adoption-an-experts-view-puridiom/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arun Srinivasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://cporising.com/?p=5568#comment-257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good summary. Couldn&#039;t agree more with the fact that effective user adoption is the most critical long-term driver for program success. If I&#039;d had to stack rank these factors, I&#039;d put &quot;end-user adoption&quot; on top of the list. Keeps all the other stakeholders focused on a simple and effective solution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary. Couldn&#8217;t agree more with the fact that effective user adoption is the most critical long-term driver for program success. If I&#8217;d had to stack rank these factors, I&#8217;d put &#8220;end-user adoption&#8221; on top of the list. Keeps all the other stakeholders focused on a simple and effective solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
